Investigation of matters referred from the Legislative Assembly on 8 August 2018
Date posted:
Modern music begins to play.
Victorian Ombudsman Deborah Glass appears in mid-shot, standing in front of a public bench near the Parliamentary precinct in Melbourne’s CBD. She is speaking directly to camera.
Glass: Last year, I was asked by Parliament to investigate matters concerning current and former Liberal and National MPs’ invoices paid by the Department of Parliamentary Services.
The opening scene fades to a shot panning down a letter from the Speaker of Victorian Parliament’s Legislative Assembly, referring matters for investigation to the Victorian Ombudsman under s 16 of the Ombudsman Act 1973 (Vic).
Glass: Essentially, I was asked to look into whether the 40 Members of Parliament knew or ought to have known whether the goods and services referred to in the invoices were provided adequately, or at all, and whether they were charged at a fair commercial rate, or an inflated rate.
An image of a document attached to the referral letter appears, containing details of the matters referred. A snapshot of paragraphs (3) and (4) of the attachment come to the forefront of the slide, highlighting a request for the Victorian Ombudsman to investigate:
(3) whether there is any evidence that goods and services provided to Liberal and National MPs fairly reflected the value and description of the items outlined in those MPs’ invoices
(4) whether members certifying as to the accuracy of the invoices knew, or ought to have known, whether the goods and services were provided adequately, or at all.
Glass: These matters related to former Liberal State Director Damien Mantach, who was convicted of fraud in 2016.
An image of an ABC News story dated 19 July 2016 appears, with the headline: “Damien Mantach: Victorian Liberal Party ex-director jailed for stealing $1.5m from party coffers”.
Glass: I was also asked to investigate whether the MPs or the Liberal Party received any kickbacks or levies from the deal struck between Mr Mantach and a mail distribution company.
Glass: Mr Mantach had indeed inflated invoices for printing and mail distribution services, using the proceeds to fund a luxurious lifestyle.
A slide appears containing an image of an annotated invoice from Melbourne Mailing Pty Ltd with the text: “Original invoice”. On a new slide, an image of the same invoice that has since been altered appears with the text: “New (inflated) invoice”. The slides compare the invoice documents, indicating that rates had been inflated by an additional $837.75.
The slide fades back to the mid-shot of the Ombudsman speaking directly to camera.
Glass: In this investigation, I found that the MPs did not know, and could not reasonably have known, that the goods and services in the invoices had been charged at an inflated rate.
Glass: Parliament also asked me to investigate whether the Member for Lowan had requested invoice dates to be altered to circumvent Parliamentary rules.
The shot fades back to the image of the document attached to the referral letter. A snapshot of paragraph (7) of the attachment comes to the forefront of the slide, highlighting a request for the Victorian Ombudsman to investigate:
(7) whether any invoices were falsified by Liberal and National MPs, in particular the Member for Lowan, to obtain payment for goods, services or advertising, bypassing the oversight rules of the Department of Parliamentary Services.
Glass: Despite the misleading impression given by an email that triggered the referral, we found no evidence of any wrongdoing.
An image of a redacted email sent on 2 July 2018 appears, listing the subject matter as: “Emma Kealy K031”, referring to the Member for Lowan. The email requests that November bookings for Emma Kealy have October dates on the invoices, as due to government rules around upcoming elections “they are not allowed to process anything with November dates on!”.
The slide fades back to the mid-shot of the Ombudsman speaking directly to camera.
Glass: In fact, my investigation found no culpability on part of any of the named MPs. But the fact that Parliamentary funds could be diverted by Mr Mantach in this fashion reflected poorly on all involved, and indeed on the whole system.
The shot fades to footage of Victoria’s Parliament House. As the camera pans the building, a tram, cars and people pass by.
Glass: Once the fraud was discovered, the Liberal Party repaid more than $175,000 taken by Mr Mantach from public funds, to Parliament.
The panning image fades back to the mid-shot of Victorian Ombudsman Deborah Glass speaking directly to camera.
Glass: But whether or not an investigation involving MPs’ expenses condemns or exonerates, the public should be concerned about the number of such allegations being made.
Glass: I’ve recommended to Parliament that there be a better system of scrutiny, with Members no longer able to certify their own expenses.
A slide appears containing the following text:
“Recommendation
The Presiding Officers of Parliament change the rules so Members are no longer able to certify their own expenses.”
The slide fades back to the mid-shot of the Ombudsman speaking directly to camera.
Glass: Such a system would provide greater certainty for members, reduce the risk of further scandals, and help rebuild public confidence about how public money is spent.
The shot fades to a closing screen containing the text: “To read the report, or for more info: www.ombudsman.vic.gov.au/inflated-invoices ”.
The text fades to black and the music fades to silence. End.